Citazioni |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c24a/4c24aa0680355095619d328e8e4c80a2fc52db36" alt="" |
Paradigm functions are ordinarily defined in terms of morpholexical functions. For any position "n" in the sequence of rules by which a word's inflections are spelled out and any complete and fully specified set [σ] of morphosyntactic features appropriate to that word's category, there is a morpholexical function MLF"n",[σ] that determines which rule (if any) applies at position "n" to realize [σ]. Given the definition of the morpholexical rules and rules of referral associated with position "n", the value of MLF "n",[σ] for a given argument follows from two general priciples: the Maximal Subset Override (14; [Stump, G. T., 1992, On the theoretical status of position class restrictions on inflectional affixes, Dordrecht: Kluwer, p. 215, 1993a, Position classes and morphological theory, Dordrecht: Kluwer]) and the Identity Function Default (15; [Stump, G. T., 1992, On the theoretical status of position class restrictions on inflectional affixes, Dordrecht: Kluwer, p. 216, 1993a, Position classes and morphological theory, Dordrecht: Kluwer]). (14) Maximal Subset Override: a. If RR determines the value of MLF"n",[σ]("x"), then MLF"n",[σ]("x")=MLF"n",[σ’]("x"), where [σ’]=RR"n",[τ]([σ]) [...]. The Maximal Subset Override is, in effect, a formalization of the Elsewhere Condition as it applies to the evaluation of morpholexical functions. - Stump (2004), a pag.104-105
|