Citazioni |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c24a/4c24aa0680355095619d328e8e4c80a2fc52db36" alt="" |
A 'substitute' is a linguistic form or grammatical feature which, under certain conventional circumstances, replaces any one of a class of linguistic forms. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.247 The substitute differs from from an ordinary linguistic form, such as 'thing', 'person', 'object', by the fact that its domain is grammatically definable. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.247 In every language we find certain forms, 'substitutes', whose meaning consists largely or entirely of class-meanings. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.146 In their class-meaning, substitutes are one step farther removed than ordinary forms from practical reality, since they designate not real objects but grammatical form-classes [...] - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.250 [...] substitutes are, so to speak, linguistic forms of the second degree. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.250 In their substitution-type, on the other hand, substitutes are more primitive than ordinary linguistic forms, for they designate simple features of the immediate situation in which the speech is being uttered. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.250 The substitute differs from an ordinary linguistic form, such as 'thing', 'person', 'object', by the fact that its domain is grammatically definable. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.247
|