[...] the meaning constists of the important things with which the speech-utterance (B) is connected, namely the practical events (A and C). - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.27 We have defined the 'meaning' of a linguistic form as the situation in which the speaker utters it and the response which it calls forth in the hearer. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.139 The statement of meaning is therefore the weak point in language-study, and will remain so until human knowledge advances very far beyond its present state. In practice, we define the meaning of a linguistic form, wherever we can, in terms of some other science. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.140 The mentalist, therefore, can define the meaning of a linguistic form as the characteristic mental event which occurs in every speaker and hearer in connection with the utterance or hearing of the linguistic form. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.142 So long as the analysis of meaning remains outside the powers of science, the analysis and recordings of languages will remain an art or practical skill. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.93 The meaning of a form for any one speaker is nothing more than a result of the situations in which he has heard this form. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.152 Our fundamental assumption implies that each linguistic form has a constant and specific meaning. - Bloomfield (1935), a pag.145
|